FOOD FOR PHILOSOPHERS

 

LYING?

Shouldn’t we really tell a liar that he’s a liar because we’re going to hurt his feelings?

Do you really believe that a liar does not hurt anyone when he lies?

What does it even mean when you defend a liar?

 

 

UNIVERSE AS EVIDENCE

“The universe is evidence of itself, not an evidence of God”.

This is a logical fallacy based on ignorance.

Ignorance does not determine what knowledge or evidence is.

 

 

EVIDENCE OF GOD

Atheist:

– There is no evidence of God.

Me:

–Except for all of life and all of Creation which is of course a small amount of evidence for an atheist.

 

 

WHEN WILL WE GET FREE OF IGNORANCE AND TRICKS?

Let’s start from the fact that Socrates, by declaring that he knows nothing, freed himself from the responsibility of knowledge and in this way gave the Sufis the task of proving what they claim to know.

That’s what atheists do today.

Atheists constantly claim that they do not know and constantly look for other people’s knowledge, but they do not have their own.

However, there is a big difference here.

Socrates displayed knowledge.

The position of atheism is very dishonest. They ask others to do everything for them. Socrates not only did not ask but gave his life for the truth, that is, for what he KNEW!

And what did Socrates know?

He knew God and truth and knowledge. The statement that he knew nothing was about atheism. That only God knows and man as an ego does not know.

Atheism is the worship of mind and ego, and therefore the cultivation of ignorance. Socrates knew this.

 

 

FOOD FOR THE MIND

 

 

He who has nothing to believe in is in obvious ignorance.

 

 

Atheism is self–perceived ignorance, which the atheist, if he does not notice, certainly ignores. There is no logic in either case.

 

 

Why does science have no real knowledge?

Because it has no knowledge of God, consciousness, love, character, morality, truth, happiness, compassion, faith and freedom.

God with his attributes is the only true and truly necessary knowledge.

Scientific knowledge is similar to today’s idea of ​​the matrix. Determining the rules and conditions of delusion.

 

 

Fact:

–Rationality finds God. This is proof that science is irrational with its rules and methods and does not have the knowledge necessary for man.

 

 

If direct personal experience counts as evidence then why do those who do not know define knowledge?

 

 

The paradox of mother and child is one of the proofs of God the Creator.

And not only that.

This is proof that considerations of the origin and age of the Universe do not make any sense.

 

 

Sometimes it happens that a married couple gets divorced and then one spouse says:

– I loved my partner but I don’t love him anymore.

You see, it’s not proof that your partner doesn’t exist or that relationship with your partner didn’t work. It is proof that you have betrayed your partner.

 

 

Science is guesswork.

 

 

How can something that a man abandoned with death be a reality?

 

 

Ignorance of God is evidence of real ignorance.

 

 

You have to believe the “evidence” anyway. That’s a fact.

 

 

He who thinks is he who does not know.

 

 

How do you distinguish between the inner and the outer world?

 

 

Not believing is not knowing.

 

 

If you already have so much faith in the evidence, why don’t you notice the million pieces of evidence that prove the rule of evidence is insecure?

 

 

Fact:

– Nothing in the world and in life happens without God’s approval.

 

 

Science is just a bigger superstition than faith in an imperfect God.

 

 

It is a very strange destruction through unbelief in God that insists on eternal ignorance and despair.